Confirmed users
538
edits
SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2016-03-29: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2016-03-29 (view source)
Revision as of 17:53, 29 March 2016
, 29 March 2016→frg: Old Unconfirmed Bugs
(→2.Next: clarified bug 1259947 on OneCRL) |
(→frg: Old Unconfirmed Bugs) |
||
| Line 214: | Line 214: | ||
* Aero Peek is broken in c-b and up see {{Bug|1256714}}. I didn't find something which could have caused this. Got it back briefly yesterday in 2.45a1 so might be e10s related (something asynchronous timing out?). | * Aero Peek is broken in c-b and up see {{Bug|1256714}}. I didn't find something which could have caused this. Got it back briefly yesterday in 2.45a1 so might be e10s related (something asynchronous timing out?). | ||
* When looking in Bugzilla what to do next I found a lot of in my eyes obsolete bugs in a short time. Who can close them. Tracking them in a meta bug? | * When looking in Bugzilla what to do next I found a lot of in my eyes obsolete bugs in a short time. Who can close them. Tracking them in a meta bug? | ||
:: '''''Comment:''''' I am working on this problem. We have lots of [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?classification=Client%20Software&query_format=advanced&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&product=SeaMonkey&list_id=12936940 UNCONFIRMED Bugs], many of them old /obsolete. But in my systematic review (may be 3 ... 5 each week) I find (approximately) 25% of these old bugs real bugs, half of them ''Core'' half of them really SeaMonkey bugs. With this speed review still will take 2 more years or so, but I think it's better than a mass-close. -- [[User:Rrbd|Rrbd]] ([[User talk:Rrbd|talk]]) 10:53, 29 March 2016 (PDT) | |||
==== IanN ==== | ==== IanN ==== | ||