AllHands2011/tbplPlanning: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
# monitor the results of a push (I also use the automated email for this)
# monitor the results of a push (I also use the automated email for this)
# finish up the post-push workflow (updating bugs with commit messages)
# finish up the post-push workflow (updating bugs with commit messages)
== Can I Push? ==
* Are there unstarred failures in recent builds?
* What are they? Should I worry about them?
** Intermittent oranges
** A failure in one build might be fixed in a later build
** Some infrastructure failures are not autodetected as such
** For the rest, eyeball them briefly:
*** does it look intermittent?
*** does it look like it was caused by that same push?
*** can I identify the culprit to harass them over IRC? (what channel?)
*** has philor looked at it? is he already agitating over it?
* Is the build infrastructure operating? (Are the expected set of jobs appearing?)
* How far behind is the build infrastructure? (tbpl-at-a-glance more convincing than magically derived "expected wait time")
== Prep for a Push ==
* Star anything not yet starred
* Wait until scary jobs go through
== Monitoring a Push ==
* Watch for new failures on preceding pushes
* Watch for failures on my push
** Triage the failures
** Trigger a backout
Confirmed users
328

edits

Navigation menu