L10n:Locale Codes: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
m (category:L10n)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


Actually, every language that's not different for different regions should go
Actually, every language that's not different for different regions should go
with the [http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/ ISO 639.1/.2] (2-letter/3-letter) language code alone in theory ("de",
with the [http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/ ISO 639.1/.2] (2-letter/3-letter) language code alone ("de",
"eo", "pl", "cs", etc.), while all where the region does matter should include
"eo", "pl", "cs", etc.), while all where the region does matter should include
it (2-letter [http://www.iso.org/iso/en/prods-services/iso3166ma/02iso-3166-code-lists/list-en1.html ISO 3166] code; locale strings look like those we have used until
it (2-letter uppercased [http://www.iso.org/iso/en/prods-services/iso3166ma/02iso-3166-code-lists/list-en1.html ISO 3166] code; locale strings look like those we have used until
now: "es-ES", "es-AR", "pt-PT", "en-US"). In some rare cases, we might need the
now: "es-ES", "es-AR", "pt-PT", "en-US"). In some rare cases, we might need the
dialect part as a third part (3- to 8-letter basically freeform part), we
dialect part as a third part (3- to 8-letter basically freeform part), we
Account confirmers, Anti-spam team, canmove, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
4,083

edits